137
Toe
217 by
the case of Military Reserves no longer required for Military purposes and this means that the Colony if it wants again to make full use of these lands must purchase from the War Department the building rights which I hold have only been held in abeyance to meet the exigencies of defence and have not been alienated to that Department.
6.
I have not overlooked the fact that Mr. Chamberlain in his Despatch No. 306 dated the 18th September, 1901, considered that when the War Office agrees to surrender the rights which it possesses of controlling the erection of buildings on any lands... that Department has a reasonable claim under the Circular of 30th December, 1894, to be credited with the difference in value between the lands, when subject to the rights in question and the value when freed from those rights' ".
7.
If you adhere to this view and consider that the rights to control the erection of buildings on any lands surrendered to the War Department by the Colony for a specific purpose extinguish the rights of the Colony to building values when this purpose has ceased to exist and in any event transfer them to the War Department then no doubt the amount to be credited to the Colony in this and similar cases of the War Department itself making use of the Reserves is the comparatively small value of the land for other than building purposes, while the amount to be debited to the Colony in case of Military Reserves no longer required as such being fully resumed will be the great difference between the building and agricultural values. I am doubtful, however, whether you will hold this view which is not even in the Military interests
137
Toe
217 by
the case of Military Reserves no longer required for Military
purposes and this means that the Colony if it wants again to
make full use of these lands must purchase from the War De-
partment the building rights which I hold have only been held
in abeyance to meet the exigencies of defence and have not
been alienated to that Department.
6.
I have not overlooked the fact that Mr.
Chamberlain in his Despatch No. 306 dated the 18th. September,
0 1901, considered that when the War Office agrees to surrender
the rights which it possesses of controlling the erection of
buildings on any lands................... that Department has a reason-
able claim under the Circular of 30th. December, 1894, to be
credited with the difference in value between the lands,
when subject to the rights in question and the value when
freed from those rights' ".
7.
If you adhere to this view and consider
that the rights to control the erection of buildings on any
lands surrendered to the War Department by the Colony for a
specific purpose extinguish the rights of the Colony to build-
ing values when this purpose has ceased to exist and in any
event transfer them to the War Department then no doubt the
amount to be credited to the Colony in this and similar cases
of the War Department itself making use of the Reserves is
the comparatively small value of the land for other than build-
ing purposes, while the amount to be debited to the Colony in
case of Military Reserves no longer required as such being
fully resumed will be the great difference between the build-
ing and agricultural values. I am doubtful, however, whether
you will hold this view which is not even in the Military
interests
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.